Is Roy within his rights to tell Jennifer not to sub Phoebe?

Home › Forums › DumTeeDum › Is Roy within his rights to tell Jennifer not to sub Phoebe?

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 10, 2017 at 8:43 am #5182
    Purple PumpkinPurple Pumpkin
    Participant

    I completely agree with you that the adult thing to do would be all three having a conversation together, in which they agree what a reasonable amount of ‘gift’ is, and also hopefully Jennie agrees that Phoebe needs to do work to earn more during the long vac. But how good a storyline would that make?

    I’m afraid it strikes me as slightly cheap to suggest everyone at Oxford is well off and flashing the cash, but also realistic to think phoebe needs to learn about managing her money.

    And of course, she also has a mother and stepmother who seem to be completely forgotten about. Hayley would surely be sensible about this if she still existed!

    July 10, 2017 at 10:10 am #5186
    KosmoKosmo
    Participant

    I think Roy was entirely right to talk to Jennifer about her behaviour without Phoebe present. What amazed me was Phoebe’s rapid volte face. In my view given how much she hates Roy for splitting the family I am surprised she listened to him at all. We all know Kate is a chocolate teapot – but Hayley ought to have been needed to solve the problem.

    July 10, 2017 at 2:56 pm #5189
    marie ingerfatffriend
    Participant

    Good points, everyone. I don’t like it when a character gets a personality transplant. One term at Oxford and Phoebe has almost become Kate.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.